Vote for one imo.Given each was the same size, which would you prefer?
Vote for one imo.
Given each was the same size, which would you prefer?
Cock #1?
cock#1 for less bitmap and text.cock#2 needs an adobe filter. D:
cock#1 for less bitmap and text.
cock#2 needs an adobe filter. D:
fat guy dicks itt.
k well anyway.Point is to illustrate the differences from circumcision. The first guy is uncut, the second is obviously cut. The first, with the skin retracted, is as close to aesthetically pleasing as a penis can get imo--consistent skin tone and texture; the skin looks soft and nice. The second has normal skin tone and texture for the lower 2/3 of the shaft, then a ring-scar, and then looks like it's fucking turned inside-out, topped with a dried-up glans.
k well anyway.
Point is to illustrate the differences from circumcision. The first guy is uncut, the second is obviously cut. The first, with the skin retracted, is as close to aesthetically pleasing as a penis can get imo--consistent skin tone and texture; the skin looks soft and nice. The second has normal skin tone and texture for the lower 2/3 of the shaft, then a ring-scar, and then looks like it's fucking turned inside-out, topped with a dried-up glans.
bumping so i don't get shocked by jakershit's pictures again
sage for apparently I have an unattractive cock.
dick 2 has unflattering picture quality, and an unflattering angle. Thanks for fucking skewing the sample.
I thought there would be shit involved.
Hay guys compare your index and ring fingers and see which one is longer. If index, you're gay. If ring, you're straight.
RONG!!!
>>1077welcome 2 highskuwl
im gay becuz i like big pricks up my asshole, not becuz of which finger iz longer, lulz.
Oh snap I wuz peepin' dis shiz on y!gallery last night
Ooh. Bubbelsh.
- wakaba 3.0.7 + futaba + futallaby -